How for God's sake do you make a picture that is as smashing as what you see in front of you? How simple isn't it then to fail, to just make a poor rendering, a travel guide illustration that doesn't give more than an impression, an encouragement to go there yourself? A doubtfulness that roots in the pleasure I had in the projects I did earlier this and last year, like citiZen and working with infrared, in which I layered a different way of seeing over 'reality' - which in the case of landscapes is just ‘a hell of a job’.
In the end I returned home with lots of these travel guide pictures and actually pretty neat ones too - but making them gave me hardly the fun that I tasted before. And so it became a struggle for me, though a learning experience too. I felt more than before that - at least for me - the challenge is not to capture what I see in the most beautiful way. It is my challenge to create an image that establishes a world in its own right that moves the imagination of the viewer
Luckily I achieved that a few times, I think - to layer my story over the landscape and to add a dimension to it. By choosing another perspective, making use of counter-light and strange weather conditions, and in post-processing for example by manipulating more explicitly the colors .
Two examples:
This image shows the fascinating landscape of Rondane - barren, deserted, covered with lichen as far as the eye reaches, with heavy clouds and drizzle You feel yourself laying on your belly, cold and left alone.
In short, I need to reinvent my landscape photography (along these lines) - or quit with it. Difficult but I must - because landscape photography gives a lot of joy, not in the least because it gives me another reason to go out. The key? To experience the landscape even deeper and to capture it from within my emotion and my inner image – and to leave the travel guide-bias and photo competitions etc. for what they are. Recognizable?






