I just put new photos, taken in Norway and Denmark, online on my website under the album name Trollheim - House of the Trolls. Please take a look.
As I already described in my previous blog post, it wasn’t easy to find my photographic way in so much landscape, so much ‘emptiness and plainness’. Nevertheless, with hindsight, I am rather satisfied anyway – apparently I still was able to get my arms around it, I think - as this picture from the fjord at Odda might prove:
Usually you only know afterwards. In my experience, the development of photos happens in three steps. First while taking the picture. Things catch my eye, I make my choices, my composition – and usually that is done rather unconsciously, on automatic pilot. What did catch my eye, what my choices were, that is what I usually realize afterwards – at the moment itself I just feel an
urge to press the release button.
The secondary process of re-discovery starts behind the computer, during post-processing, when I play with contrast and color, explore the possibilities (and meaning) of the image. Then things start to get their place – I get to see what moved me to take the picture, recognize the intent I (might) have (had) and bring that to the surface.
The third phase is when I oversee all of my selected and processed images and try to order them for placement on my website. They need to convey a common story together. Then the third instrument comes in: ‘beeldspraak’ (Dutch for: talking in metaphors, figurative language). People say often: "an image can tell more than a thousand words" – but I don’t agree on that. Language can be very figurative, and storytelling using figurative language can very well create its own images that are at least as powerful as the ‘beeldtaal’ (image-language) of the pictures.
Language gives context, enables to link, associate, and to put things in context. That is why I link on my website images with language – a language that besides conveying cognitive meaning (nouns) appeal on imagination by means of sound (e.g., alliteration) and figurative or physical associations. For example, in this latest album
Trollheim I use images and sounds from Norwegian (mingling Dutch and Norsk to a kind of ‘Neersk’) and Norwegian mythology (the Edda) to ‘taste’ the images and (in the first place for myself) to give them context – which is also a kind of post-processing I wouldn’t want to miss.
Vice versa, this helps me to shift the emphasis in my post-processing where needed – and further back: to sharpen my unconsciousness to see things better next time, to better associate and capture better pictures.
I know, mixing words and images is rather controversial amongst photographers - but what do you think?